| 摘 要： |
It is important to obtain the soil heat flux at a specific depth (Gz) and at the ground's surface (G0) to understand the surface energy balance and climate change. However, previous evaluations of Gz and G0 simulations based on multiple sites have been relatively insufficient. We evaluated the accuracy of using physical mechanism-based gradient and calorimetry methods to simulate Gz and changes in heat storage (Delta S) based on observations collected at 28 sites. Three methods for simulating G0 were also evaluated using triple collocation (TC) and extended triple collocation (ETC) metrics. The ability of the gradient method to simulate Gz was strong, particularly for the lower soil layer, with a median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), correlation coefficient (CC), and index of agreement for the evaluated sites of 0.76, 0.86, and 0.91, respectively. The accuracy of the calorimetry method for simulating Delta S was generally lower than that of the gradient method for determining Gz. Overall, the combination of gradient analysis and calorimetry showed the best performance in simulating G0. The TC evaluation showed that the combination of gradient and calorimetry had a strong ability to simulate G0 in most land cover types (root mean square error (RMSE) <4 W/m2) but this ability was lost in the snow cover type (RMSE > 10 W/m2). When evaluated by ETC, the three methods had strong effects only on alpine meadow, floodland, and shrub types (CC > 0.70). Appropriate evaluation indices were recommended based on the application of the model. |
在线留言
联系我们
所长信箱