| 摘 要： |
Global land use/cover change (LUCC) datasets are essential for quantitatively assessing the impacts of LUCC on global change, but many uncertainties in existing global datasets seriously hamper climate modeling. Evaluating the reliability of existing global LUCC datasets is a precondition for improved data quality. In this study, based on the regional historical document-based reconstructions, satellite-based data, and historical reclamation evidence for the Xinjiang area of China, the accuracy and rationality of cropland data for this area in the HYDE 3.2 and SAGE datasets were evaluated by utilizing comparative analysis regarding three aspects, namely the change tendency of the cropland area, the area of cropland, and the differences in spatial pattern. This study concluded that the amount of cropland in the Xinjiang area in the global and regional datasets shows both disparate trends and large differences in absolute values. Spatially, historical reclamation evidence indicated that agricultural cultivation in the Xinjiang area underwent expansion from south to north and from east to west over the past 300 years; however, the global datasets revealed that the cropland spatial patterns in the Xinjiang area in the historical period are similar to those in the current period. These differences are attributable to the uncertainties of the basic assumptions, per capita cropland area estimates, and reconstruction methods in the global datasets. The findings of the study highlight the necessity of regional studies on historical LUCC in the Xinjiang area. |
在线留言
联系我们
所长信箱